Showing posts with label bagatelle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bagatelle. Show all posts
Monday, May 6, 2013
Freudian
In honor of Freud's birthday, here is a painting of Freud and Jung kissing.
Freud appears 13 times in my book. When he saw his mother naked. When he got his famous couch. When he started collecting totems. His attempt to stop smoking. A list of who he got birthday cards from when he turned 80. An altogether interesting life.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Valentine
I did Valentines for my near & dear last week, as I always do.
This is the one I did for my very dearest, Faith.
Sunday, December 25, 2011
Bagatelle Story-frame 7
Saturday, December 24, 2011
Bagatelle Story-frame 6
Friday, December 23, 2011
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Bagatelle Story-frame 3
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Bagatelle Story-frame 2
Monday, December 19, 2011
Bagatelle Story-frame 1
Thursday, September 29, 2011
A New Bagatelle

I began doing these silhouetted images several years ago, inspired by the cut-paper art of Hans Christian Andersen (the fairy tale guy). I did one for our family Christmas card that year. I did several small narrative series for the New Yorker. I kept revising and perfecting them and inventing new ones for my art directors there. They were never used. But the form continues to intrigue me. I think they'd make a wonderful endpaper or book cover. Or scarf or area rug or wallpaper or dress fabric. This one was painted for my wife's birthday. I have no idea what it means or what the vignettes are about. A story seems to emerge as I paint, and it's always better unrehearsed, like a Rorschach seen in the patterns of the foliage outside a window.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Bagatelle no. 25
What do these mean? What do they suggest to you? And where was my head at when I began Bagatelle no. 1?
The first two in this series were painted for a gallery show in Florida that never came off. (The gallery folded the week I showed up for the opening.) Numbers 1 and 2 were in American Illustration a few years ago, but no design or ad work has come of it. The New Yorker asked me to do a series of these but never published them.
They are peculiar, allusive and vague. If they are "fine art" maybe I have no business doing them. Maybe they are the visual equivalent of my recent short stories, the ones that connect up but never answer the questions raised. These stories have been admired but, again, never published. If this category of work is a dead end it is at least an interesting and thoughtful one, but nobody these days pays people to think or suggest things they can't resolve neatly.
The first two in this series were painted for a gallery show in Florida that never came off. (The gallery folded the week I showed up for the opening.) Numbers 1 and 2 were in American Illustration a few years ago, but no design or ad work has come of it. The New Yorker asked me to do a series of these but never published them.
They are peculiar, allusive and vague. If they are "fine art" maybe I have no business doing them. Maybe they are the visual equivalent of my recent short stories, the ones that connect up but never answer the questions raised. These stories have been admired but, again, never published. If this category of work is a dead end it is at least an interesting and thoughtful one, but nobody these days pays people to think or suggest things they can't resolve neatly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









