Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Judicious Illustration

The op-ed I was asked to illustrate in the LATimes was about how the Supreme Court was being endangered by extreme partisanship.

The trick with art like this is to avoid false equivalencies. I happen to think it's not a good idea to put hardline political operatives on the high court. I don't think it's wise to elevate an alleged sexual predator to the Supreme Court. I also think Americans might distrust a justice who has difficulties with telling the truth and seems skilled at hiding it. Call me old-fashioned...

So...here is the finished art. It isn't as sharp as I'd wanted to make it. False equivalency standards require both sides be pilloried or neither, which often tends to undermine the point. This art ended up blaming neither party for this episode. In my opinion the old American principle of "majority rules" was exercised by the Republican majority (to take a hypothetical example) as two men might force their wishes upon a 15 year-old girl in a locked bedroom.

Or is that too hypothetical? Certainly no self-respecting elephant would act that way.

1 comment:

  1. Is a study uncommon in a manner that entails more justification, including, 1) your own investigation runs on the approach to study hardly ever put on earlier than; two) an individual's go through investigates an extremely clever and also advanced exploration dilemma; and also, 3) a person's analysis is dependent with studying distinct text messaging and forms, like archival substances or simply main docs just like diaries or perhaps particular characters, that definitely not characterize the particular proven entire body connected with form booklets over the matter. https://imgur.com/a/dkItdEA https://imgur.com/a/C6nwkCp https://imgur.com/a/jKY93Hb https://imgur.com/a/bNN35h6 https://imgur.com/a/fg60hIR https://imgur.com/a/mRU79pO https://imgur.com/a/VPeQBdI